首页> 外文OA文献 >Lethal Means Access and Assessment among Suicidal Emergency Department Patients
【2h】

Lethal Means Access and Assessment among Suicidal Emergency Department Patients

机译:致命意味着自杀急诊科患者的获取和评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Reducing access to lethal means (especially firearms) might prevent suicide, but counseling of at-risk individuals about this strategy may not be routine. Among emergency department (ED) patients with suicidal ideation or attempts (SI/SA), we sought to describe home firearm access and examine ED provider assessment of access to lethal means.METHODS: This secondary analysis used data from the Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation, a three-phase, eight-center study of adult ED patients with SI/SA (2010-2013). Research staff surveyed participants about suicide-related factors (including home firearms) and later reviewed the ED chart (including documented assessment of lethal means access).RESULTS: Among 1,358 patients with SI/SA, 11% (95% CI: 10-13%) reported \u3e/=1 firearm at home; rates varied across sites (range: 6-26%) but not over time. On chart review, 50% (95% CI: 47-52%) of patients had documentation of lethal means access assessment. Frequency of documented assessment increased over study phases (40-60%, P \u3c .001) but was not associated with state firearm ownership rates. Among the 337 (25%, 95% CI: 23-27%) patients discharged to home, 55% (95% CI: 49-60%) had no documentation of lethal means assessment; of these, 13% (95% CI: 8-19%; n = 24) actually had \u3e/=1 firearm at home. Among all those reporting \u3e/=1 home firearm to study staff, only half (50%, 95% CI: 42-59%) had provider documentation of assessment of lethal means access.CONCLUSIONS: Among these ED patients with SI/SA, many did not have documented assessment of home access to lethal means, including patients who were discharged home and had \u3e/=1 firearm at home.
机译:背景:减少获取致命手段(尤其是枪支)的机会可能会预防自杀,但是对有风险的个人进行此策略咨询可能不是常规的。在具有自杀意念或企图(SI / SA)的急诊科(ED)患者中,我们试图描述家用枪支的使用情况,并检查ED提供者对致命手段的使用评估。方法:该次分析使用了急诊科安全评估和随访评估,这是一项针对成年ED的SI / SA ED患者的三阶段,八中心研究(2010-2013年)。研究人员调查了与自杀有关的因素(包括家庭枪支),然后审查了ED图(包括对致死手段的书面评估)。结果:在1358名SI / SA患者中,11%(95%CI:10-13) %)报告在家中\ u3e / = 1枪支;网站间的费率有所不同(范围为6-26%),但不会随时间而变化。在图表审查中,有50%(95%CI:47-52%)的患者具有进行致命性途径评估的文件。在研究阶段,文件化评估的频率增加(40-60%,P <0.001),但与国家枪支拥有率无关。在出院的337名患者中(25%,95%CI:23-27%),其中55%(95%CI:49-60%)没有进行致死性评估的文件;其中,有13%(95%CI:8-19%; n = 24)实际上在家拥有\ u3e / = 1枪支。在所有向研究人员报告的家用枪支中,只有一半(50%,95%CI:42-59%)具有提供致命性手段评估的提供者文件。结论:在这些患有SI / SA的ED患者中,许多人还没有记录下来的评估家庭使用致死手段的方法,包括那些已出院并在家中拥有\ u3e / = 1枪支的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号